Release 02 video analysis
USO near submarine video: what DOW-UAP-PR067 actually shows
DOW-UAP-PR067 may be the most clickable Release 02 video title so far: “Multiple Spherical UAP USO near Sub. [CALLSIGN] 2022/03/25 in and out of water.” The official DVIDS page gives the title, a 4:50 infrared-derived video, a March 25, 2022 incident date, and an AARO source path. The public description, though, is much narrower. It repeatedly describes areas of contrast moving through a sensor field of view while the sensor pans and zooms.
Official DVIDS video
The official player loads only after selection. The source link remains available for direct verification.
Source record
- Video ID
- 1007779
- Incident date
- 2022-03-25
- Runtime
- 4 minutes 50 seconds
- Location
- Undisclosed location
- VIRIN
- 220325-D-D0360-4772
- Filename
- DOD_111720696
A title with more force than the public description
PR067 matters because it exposes the central problem in many 2026 UFO files: a title can sound explosive while the public source description remains cautious. A serious reading has to hold both facts at once. The title raises a USO/submarine question. The video description gives tracked contrast areas, time windows, and missing metadata.
The 4:50 PR067 sequence
- 00:45-00:56 - DVIDS says one area of contrast enters from the lower-left side of the screen, moves toward the lower-right side, and is tracked by sensor panning.
- 00:57-01:10 - A second area of contrast enters from the lower-right side. The sensor tries to keep both in view; one leaves the frame and the second later appears from the middle-left side.
- 01:11-01:35 - The sensor continues panning to track the second area of contrast.
- 01:36 - The sensor zooms out and loses view of the second area.
- 02:11-03:05 - Another contrast area enters from the lower-right side, moves off the left side, reenters from the lower-right side, and is tracked again.
- 04:09-04:37 - A contrast area enters from the right side, crosses the field of view, and the sensor pans to track it.
Why this clip is drawing attention
- The title supplies the USO and submarine hook, but DVIDS says the title is uploader-defined. That is not the same as a published final analytical conclusion.
- The description never uses “submarine” in the timestamp notes and does not describe a confirmed water entry, water exit, splash, wake, underwater track, or sonar correlation.
- The video still has investigative value because it presents multiple tracked contrast areas across a water-linked scene rather than a single isolated flash.
- The repeated panning and reacquisition moments matter. They may indicate separate objects, sensor-handling effects, ordinary targets moving through a narrow field, or a mixture of visual and platform motion.
- The chain-of-custody caveat applies: AARO identified responsive material on a classified network, and DVIDS says many items in the collection lack substantiated chain of custody.
Read the title and the description separately
The title says the big thing: multiple spherical UAP, USO, near a submarine, in and out of water. The public description says a smaller thing: areas of contrast entering and leaving the sensor field while the operator pans and zooms. PR067 becomes interesting precisely because those two layers do not carry the same evidentiary weight.
What the clip gives readers to inspect
Unlike very short Release 02 clips, PR067 gives several passes to compare. Readers can watch whether the contrast areas hold shape, whether they appear to move together, whether the sensor is doing most of the motion, and whether the later passes look like the same kind of object or separate events grouped into one received file.
- Use 00:45-01:10 as the first two-object sequence.
- Use 02:11-03:05 as the strongest reacquisition segment.
- Use 04:09-04:37 as the final comparison pass.
Why “in and out of water” is not settled by the public notes
The phrase “in and out of water” is why PR067 travels online. But a water-transition claim needs more than a title. The public page would need a visible waterline event, time-synced platform data, range, viewing angle, sea state, thermal behavior, and preferably radar, sonar, or mission notes. Without those, the public record supports a USO lead, not a confirmed transmedium conclusion.
How PR067 differs from PR052
PR052 is a formation problem: four contrast areas, edits, filters, and a USO label. PR067 is a title-versus-description problem: a stronger submarine/water title paired with timestamp notes that stay with moving contrast areas. Together they show why Release 02 video analysis has to be record-by-record instead of one broad “Pentagon UFO videos” summary.
The ordinary-object test should be taken seriously
Birds, distant aircraft, surface clutter, debris, optical artifacts, and sensor handling all belong in the first round of tests. That does not dismiss the file. It makes the analysis stronger. A case only gets more interesting when ordinary explanations are named clearly and then tested against the source footage and missing metadata.
Why PR067 is spreading in discussion
PR067 is getting attention because the title is unusually loaded and the official video is easy to share. UAP Logbook’s review frames the same title-description gap as the central issue, and Avi Loeb’s Release 02 assessment highlighted PR067 as one of the notable videos. Those reactions are useful context, but the official DVIDS page remains the evidence anchor.
- Strong-reading angle: a government-published title says multiple spherical UAP/USO near a submarine and in/out of water.
- Careful-reading angle: AARO’s public description says areas of contrast in infrared-derived footage and does not publish the missing water-transition evidence.
- Reader value: the clip is worth watching because the timestamps allow people to compare several passes instead of relying only on a viral title.
What the official record shows
The official record shows a Release 02 DVIDS video labeled DOW-UAP-PR067, with an uploader-defined title referencing multiple spherical UAP/USO near a submarine, a 4:50 runtime, a March 25, 2022 incident date, and timestamp notes describing tracked areas of contrast.
Where the submarine and water claims stop
The public file does not prove submarine proximity, underwater travel, transmedium movement, non-human origin, coordinated objects, or final identity. It does not publish range, altitude, platform motion, sea-state context, sonar correlation, radar track, original unaltered media, or a final AARO determination.
Records needed before calling it a USO case
The records that would move PR067 forward are the original uncompressed file, platform and sensor metadata, range estimates, sea-state and weather context, radar or sonar correlation, mission notes, the basis for the submarine reference, and any AARO explanation of the uploader-defined title.
Related records and terms
Sources
- DOW-UAP-PR067 DVIDS video - Official DVIDS video page for the Release 02 multiple spherical UAP/USO near submarine record.
- Department of War Release 02 portal - Official PURSUE portal view showing Release 02, cleared for release on May 22, 2026.
- Department of War May 22, 2026 Release 02 announcement - Official Department of War announcement for the second PURSUE UAP file release.
- House Oversight March 31, 2026 UAP video request letter - Official House Oversight letter from Rep. Anna Paulina Luna requesting 46 UAP-related videos from the Department of War.
- UAP Logbook PR067 review - Independent PR067 review used as a public-discussion signal around the USO near submarine title and source-description gap.
- Avi Loeb Release 02 assessment - Public scientific commentary on the second release used as reaction context, not as official evidence.