Mission report

DOW-UAP-D18: Iraq December 2022 possible UAP/UAV report

By UFO Disclosure Files Editorial Desk Published 2026-05-08 Updated 2026-05-12 Department of War / USCENTCOM Official record

DOW-UAP-D18 is useful because it is restrained: it records a possible UAP/UAV observation without dramatic conclusions.

Official PDF

6 pages

DOW-UAP-D18 mission report PDF

The official PDF loads only after selection so the article stays fast on mobile.

Open PDF source

D18 source metadata

Document type
Mission report approved for release to AARO
Operation
Operation Inherent Resolve
Location context
Iraq / Baghdad area as described in the record summary
Reported observation
One possible UAP/UAV moving west to east
Evidence weight
Useful as a written operational record, weak as a visual case because no public image or video is attached

Why this restrained report matters

DOW-UAP-D18 is restrained compared with the more visually dramatic Release 01 records. Its value is showing how routine mission reporting can still enter the UAP record.

Incident summary

The report describes an ISR mission connected to Operation Inherent Resolve and records one possible UAP/UAV observation near Iraq, with the mission continuing afterward.

Confirmed mission-report facts

  • The report is a six-page mission report approved for release to AARO.
  • The mission was connected to Operation Inherent Resolve.
  • The UAP section lists one possible UAP/UAV sighted.
  • The record says the object was observed flying west to east and the mission continued as tasked.

What is missing from the public record

  • The record itself keeps the identification open by using possible UAP/UAV language.
  • No public image, video, or final identification is included with the available record summary.
  • The record is a useful contrast to the more visual Release 01 material because it shows how routine mission reporting can enter the UAP file set.

What the report records

The report documents a possible object observation during an ISR mission and states no effects on persons were reported.

How to place the report

  • The record is best understood alongside other Iraq and Middle East mission reports in Release 01.
  • Its cautious “possible UAP/UAV” language matters because it leaves conventional explanations open.

Why the UAP/UAV wording matters

D18 is valuable precisely because it does not overstate itself. The paired “UAP/UAV” wording keeps two possibilities alive: an unidentified anomalous phenomenon in the reporting sense, or a more conventional unmanned aerial vehicle that was not identified at the time. That makes the page useful for readers who want careful classification rather than viral certainty.

Operationally interesting, visually weak

The record belongs in the Release 01 archive because it shows how operational reports can enter a UAP pipeline. It is not a strong visual case in its current public form. Without imagery, full-motion video, radar, or a later investigative conclusion, the analysis should focus on classification language, location context, and missing follow-up evidence.

  • Strong enough to document that an official report existed.
  • Not strong enough to infer unusual performance or origin.
  • Best used as a baseline against richer cases such as D20, PR28, or PR34.

What would change the evidence grade

The evidence grade would rise if a later tranche adds FMV, sensor logs, air-defense correlation, weather/airspace records, or AARO notes explaining why the object remained unresolved. Until then, D18 should remain a restrained source page rather than a dramatic claim page.

Why this record should not be ignored

Public attention naturally moves toward videos, orbs, and hard-to-explain movement claims. D18 is quieter, but that makes it useful for serious readers: it shows the lower end of the evidence spectrum and helps separate “officially released” from “visually compelling.”

  • The exact record ID matters because it anchors the discussion to a specific PDF.
  • The record is useful for researchers comparing Iraq and Middle East entries inside Release 01.
  • Discussion should stay cautious because the official public record does not include media for independent frame analysis.

What the report does not identify

The document does not provide public imagery, a final identification, or proof that the object was anomalous rather than a UAV or other aircraft.

Follow-up evidence

What FMV exploitation, operational logs, or AARO analysis followed this report?

Tags

DOW-UAP-D18Iraq UAPDecember 2022

Sources